For Their Daughter's Death?
I was surprised to hear that Carter Ruck who will clearly do anything for money are once again trying to suppress the truth about this absolutely classic example of reckless endangerment which almost deffinitely led to the death of Madelaine McCann.
Surely the public have the right to publish the questions below which are very much in the public domain.
I make no claim as to who killed Madelaine McCann or that she was killed, as such, in fact I do not claim to know she is dead - but as many will remember, without sound provenance and with exactly the same claimed evidence Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi and Lamin Khalifah Fhimah were charged with the bombing of Pan Am 103 on 21-Dec-1988 - the one was found guilty and the other not guilty and released based upon the corrupting influence of Lord Cullen whose summing up - based upon the same evidence stated that in his opinion and on the balance of possibilities it is entirely probable that Al Megrahi was guilty of the crime!
Using the same Justice Kate & Gerry McCann should currently be serving life sentences in my opinion.
I must admit I would not wish to see them tried in any court as corrupt as those Lord Cullen has previously presided over where he has arbitrarily hidden evidence and embargoed documents for as much as 100 years without lawfull reason or legal right.
I appreciate Kate & Gerry McCann are well trained oiks and both are qualified as Doctors but who would want either of these creepy people who seem to have made a small fortune out of what can only possibly be seen as the crime of reckless endangerment. I personally believe that Carter Ruck are utterly irresponsible to be making efforts to suppress the truth and shelter these two criminals.
Carter Ruck act to intimidate people in their own version of bullying and gratuitous harrassment by seeking to intimidate people into control of free speech - I believe Kate & Gerry McCann are directly responsible for the probable death of their Daughter Madeleinne and that Carter Ruck are threatening, abusing and harrassing individuals for placing an audio version of the questions below on YouTube is a huge breach of Carter Ruck's duty, privilege and integrity bringing the law into disrepute.
It is utterly irrefutable that Kate & Gerry McCann are responsible for the death of their daughter by way of reckless endangerment - there is incontovertible evidence and they are unable to refute the FACT that they did leave 3 minor children without supervision or care in an appartment whilst they, together with friends went out carousing for their own gratification and indulgence.
That the children were recklessly endangered is not only irrefutable but proven by the very fact their eldest daughter whilst abandoned died or alternatively but in my humble opinion most unlikely, was abducted.
Why has this child not had the benefit of protection under common Justice? Why have Kate & Gerry not been arrested and charged?
One is forced to ask has their status and their immediate quick witted use of publicity spared them the justice they deserve, could it be that had their names been Tracey and Damien they would have been marched off to encaceration in minutes from a sink estate?
Are there TWO laws operative in Britain, Portugal and the corrupt EU?
One law for those who have and one law for those who do not!
The 48 questions Kate McCann wouldn't answer!
- and the one she did
By Daily Mail Reporter
- and the one she did
By Daily Mail Reporter
5th August 2008
During eleven hours of interrogation, Kate McCann refused to answer 48 specific questions.
Madeleine's mother, who was legally represented in the interview, stayed silent as police threw a series of loaded questions at her that made clear they thought she was involved in her daughter's disappearance.
She answered only once - when accused of harming the hunt for Madeleine by her silence.
Kate McCann: She only answered one question during 11 hours of interrogation
More...How Portuguese police tried to force Gerry to confess with a DNA trap
Pictured: The bedroom where Madeleine McCann met her fate
Revealed: The Maddie e-fits the public never saw
Maddie police were no Poirots, mock their OWN prosecutors
These are the questions:
1. On May 3 2007, around 22:00, when you entered the apartment, what did you see? What did you do? Where did you look? What did you touch?
2. Did you search inside the bedroom wardrobe? (she replied that she wouldn’t answer)
3. (shown 2 photographs of her bedroom wardrobe) Can you describe its contents?
4. Why had the curtain behind the sofa in front of the side window (whose photo was shown to her) been tampered with? Did somebody go behind that sofa?
5. How long did your search of the apartment take after you detected your daughter Madeleine’s disappearance?
6. Why did you say from the start that Madeleine had been abducted?
7. Assuming Madeleine had been abducted, why did you leave the twins home alone to go to the ‘Tapas’ and raise the alarm? Because the supposed abductor could still be in the apartment.
8. Why didn’t you ask the twins, at that moment, what had happened to their sister or why didn’t you ask them later on?
9. When you raised the alarm at the ‘Tapas’ what exactly did you say and what were your exact words?
10. What happened after you raised the alarm in the ‘Tapas’?
11. Why did you go and warn your friends instead of shouting from the verandah?
12. Who contacted the authorities?
13. Who took place in the searches?
14. Did anyone outside of the group learn of Madeleine’s disappearance in those following minutes?
15. Did any neighbour offer you help after the disappearance?
16. What does 'we let her down' mean?
17. Did Jane tell you that night that she’d seen a man with a child?
18. How were the authorities contacted and which police force was alerted?
19. During the searches, with the police already there, where did you search for Maddie, how and in what way?
20. Why did the twins not wake up during that search or when they were taken upstairs?
21. Who did you phone after the occurrence?
22. Did you call Sky News?
23. Did you know the danger of calling the media, because it could influence the abductor?
24. Did you ask for a priest?
25. By what means did you divulge Madeleine’s features, by photographs or by any other means?
26. Is it true that during the searches you remained seated on Maddie’s bed without moving?
27. What was your behaviour that night?
28. Did you manage to sleep?
29. Before travelling to Portugal did you make any comment about a foreboding or a bad feeling?
30. What was Madeleine’s behaviour like?
31. Did Maddie suffer from any illness or take any medication?
32. What was Madeleine’s relationship like with her brother and sister?
33. What was Madeleine’s relationship like with her brother and sister, friends and school mates?
34. As for your professional life, in how many and which hospitals have you worked?
35. What is your medical specialty?
36. Have you ever done shift work in any emergency services or other services?
37. Did you work every day?
38. At a certain point you stopped working, why?
39. Are the twins difficult to get to sleep? Are they restless and does that cause you uneasiness?
40. Is it true that sometimes you despaired with your children’s behaviour and that left you feeling very uneasy?
41. Is it true that in England you even considered handing over Madeleine’s custody to a relative?
42. In England, did you medicate your children? What type of medication?
43. In the case files you were SHOWN CANINE forensic testing films, where you can see them marking due to detection of the scent of human corpse and blood traces, also human, and only human, as well as all the comments of the technician in charge of them. After watching and after the marking of the scent of corpse in your bedroom beside the wardrobe and behind the sofa, pushed up against the sofa wall, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
44. When the sniffer dog also marked human blood behind the sofa, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
45. When the sniffer dog marked the scent of corpse coming from the vehicle you hired a month after the disappearance, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
46. When human blood was marked in the boot of the vehicle, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
47. When confronted with the results of Maddie’s DNA, whose analysis was carried out in a British laboratory, collected from behind the sofa and the boot of the vehicle, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
48. Did you have any responsibility or intervention in your daughter’s disappearance?
A QUESTION SHE DID ANSWER
Q. Are you aware that in not answering the questions you are jeopardising the investigation, which seeks to discover what happened to your daughter?
A. 'Yes, if that’s what the investigation thinks.'
To view the original article CLICK HERE
Now see: CLICK HERE
This probable manslaughter/accident took place in May 2007 why have 10s of £1,000 been spent on fund raising for the parents and to defend them yet not one cent has been invested in prosecuting them for neglect leading to the death/disappearance of their daughter.
An interesting article - the text can be viewed if you CLICK HERE
There are now two books dealing with and discussing the details the one written by an investigative journalist in New York with whom I have had lengthy conversation, prior to the publication of the book called 'Madelaine McCann Faked Abduction' which I had expected to be quite good prior to publication but it has been hugely denigrated by promotion via gutter broadcasting and a known serial liar and abuser, bully and neo nutter a member of The Mormon Church who sees himself as an incarnation of The Holy Ghost called Paul Drockton - one can reasonably assume that as he has a high profile role in marketing the book it is probably a pack of lies and unmittigated bunckum, or at very least implausibly suspect - though I concede being aware he was associated I have not bothered reading the book.
There is also a book by the Portuguese Detective who was lead in investigation for the Police, who stated he is convinced the child died in the appartment. I have not read his book but urge you to seek out what facts you can and draw your own conclusion - do not let corrupt organisations like Carter Ruck intimidate you and block reasonable freedom of speech.
Finally I reitterate that I believe that Kate & Gerry McCann should be arrested and charged with the reckless endangerment of their 3 minor children a result of which was the probable demise of Madeleinne the eldest or as an outside possibility her abduction.
Either situation was their fault and responsibility and as Doctors they were in gross negligence of their parental and professional duties and training and were indisputably aware of the risks which they flagrantly ignored for their own selfish gain.
McCanns: Amaral's documentary
will never be shown in England
That Kate & Gerry McCann brought their profession into disrepute is undeniable.
Make your vote count Write on YOUR ballot Paper LEAVE THE EU