#G117* - BEWARE ABUSE of THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION!

#G117* - BEWARE ABUSE of THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION!

Hi,

Recently the following 'e'Mail arrived in my In Box, which led me to seek a little clarity.

To defeat the EU and liberate our peoples from vassal status in the obscene and self serving undemocratic EU experiment, which is so damaging, not only for our peoples but very clearly for the peoples of the world. It is essential we do not disipate the efforts of the passionate patriots by false alleys and false premises.

It will have been noted that by raising the awareness of the Patriot and then failing them all too often leads to driving them into the arms of such vile organisations as The BNP, The National Front, Fabianism, Searchlight, UAF, Common Purpose extremist and anti British and worse.

One only has to note the amount of promotion given to The BNP by Farage of EUkip and the bullies, liars and incompetents he has gathered around him - clearly the greatest aid The BNP could have prayed for - and we all know what he achieved!

An object lesson for those who would seek to mislead Patriots, whether for personal gain or from personal ignorance.

From: Namaste Publishing
To: Undisclosed-Recipient@yahoo.com
Sent: Monday, 8 June, 2009 14:12:54a
Subject: Fw: The EU is a POLICE STATE and is destroying the UK. Our fishing, our farming and our industry. - CRITICAL

Please move this on!

https://www.thebcgroup.org.uk/conference/


The EU is destroying the UK. Our fishing, our farming and our industry.

Many of us are already aware of this fact, but too many of us either do not seem to care or have our heads so firmly buried in the sand, that they don't seem to have noticed or understand what is happening around them. We are calling for those amongst us who know what is going on and who care enough, to join us and stand up for our sovereignty, our rights and the rule of law.

British politicians have already voted in favour of an EU police state, courtesy of the Lisbon Treaty - its full ratification awaits a 2nd Irish vote in October 2009.

Why is the sovereignty of 60 million Britons being determined by an Irish referendum?


Conference - 13th June 2009



Friends House, 173-177 Euston Road, London NW1 2BJ


At the next election, the British Constitution Group is calling for a boycott of the three main political parties who have collectively betrayed this nation, transferring our national sovereignty into the hands of a corrupt and undemocratic regime. This regime, through the powers given to it by the collective political establishment, has all the hallmarks of a police state, with the power to arrest, detain, and imprison any one of us without any evidence of any crime having been committed. The British Constitution Group is calling for Lawful Rebellion, as is our right under article 61 of the Magna Carta 1215, until such times as our sovereignty is restored, our constitution reinstated, and the rule of law upheld. We need the support of patriotic Britons to achieve this end

Who will stand up for the United Kingdom? - Not the Main Parties, that's for sure!


Hi,

In view of the suggestions of the so called British Constitution Group - HERE is a copy of Article 61 of The Magna Carta - they fail to make it clear whether they mean The Magna Carta as signed in June 1215 or the amended version which was the one legitimised and implemented in 1216.

61.

Inasmuch as, for the sake of God, and for the bettering of our realm, and for the more ready healing of the discord which has arisen between us and our barons, we have made all these aforesaid concessions,--wishing them to enjoy for ever entire and firm stability, we make and grant to them the folIowing security: that the baron, namely, may elect at their pleasure twenty five barons from the realm, who ought, with all their strength, to observe, maintain and cause to be observed, the peace and privileges which we have granted to them and confirmed by this our present charter. In such wise, namely, that if we, or our justice, or our bailiffs, or any one of our servants shall have transgressed against any one in any respect, or shall have broken one of the articles of peace or security, and our transgression shall have been shown to four barons of the aforesaid twenty five: those four barons shall come to us, or, if we are abroad, to our justice, showing to us our error; and they shall ask us to cause that error to be amended without delay. And if we do not amend that error, or, we being abroad, if our justice do not amend it within a term of forty days from the time when it was shown to us or, we being abroad, to our justice: the aforesaid four barons shall refer the matter to the remainder of the twenty five barons, and those twenty five barons, with the whole land in common, shall distrain and oppress us in every way in their power,--namely, by taking our castles, lands and possessions, and in every other way that they can, until amends shall have been made according to their judnnent. Saving the persons of ourselves, our queen and our children. And when amends shall have been made they shall be in accord with us as they had been previously. And whoever of the land wishes to do so, shall swear that in carrying out all the aforesaid measures he will obey the mandates of the aforesaid twenty five barons, and that, with them, he will oppress us to the extent of his power. And, to any one who wishes to do so, we publicly and freely give permission to swear; and we will never prevent any one from swearing. Moreover, all those in the land who shall be unwilling, themselves and of their own accord, to swear to the twenty five barons as to distraining and oppressing us with them: such ones we shall make to wear by our mandate, as has been said. And if any one of the twenty five barons shall die, or leave the country, or in any other way be prevented from carrying out the aforesaid measures,--the remainder of the aforesaid twenty five barons shall choose another in his place, according to their judgment, who shall be sworn in the same way as the others. Moreover, in all things entrusted to those twenty five barons to be carried out, if those twenty five shall be present and chance to disagree among themselves with regard to some matter, or if some of them, having been summoned, shall be unwilling or unable to be present: that which the majority of those present shall decide or decree shall be considered binding and valid, just as if all the twenty five had consented to it. And the aforesaid twenty five shall swear that they will faithfully observe all the foregoing, and will caue them be observed to the extent of their power. And we shall obtain nothing from any one, either through ourselves or through another, by which any of those concessions and liberties may be revoked or diminished. And if any such thing shall have been obtained, it shall be vain and invalid, and we shall never make use of it either through ourselves or through another.

I understand that despite all legal advice a few in the group saw fit to raise £3,000+ from the unsuspecting to obtain a legal opinion on 'Treason' having had advice from several well qualified individuals showing beyond doubt that the law which they were seeking to use was in the main founded on false premise, misunderstandings and a lack of sound understanding of the law.

Despite the facts I understand the money was raised and an opinion sought of a QC of stature specialising in Constitutional Law both arcane and current.

To date I am led to believe that not only has no opinion been published nor has the name and Chambers of The Silk been forthcoming.

I look forward to reading the opinion and hope all the other Barristers who have read the aims can be proven wrong and that there is some way to utilise Medieval Law in a modern court minded that the Treason Laws have been repealed and the law when it used to be in force was bound by two factors making it near on inapplicable even when it did exist.

For the provenance, beyond reasonable doubt,, of Treason:

FIRSTLY:
Intent MUST be proven

SECONDLY:
Treason carried a 3 year statute of limitation.

I believe that no treason can be proven under the laws as they did exist and there is no such case for treason under the laws as they do exist.

Let us know the provenance and stature of The QC and The Chambers and let us have the FACTS as provided in The Opinion, which of course without the full details of the Silk concerned is as but toilet paper!

There is in fact no need to over complicate the situation by seeking out arcane Medieval law which has long since been repealed, whether you or I like it or not!

What is wrong with showing that the signature/authorisation of The Treaty of Rome was and is unlawful and is thus invalid - so much easier!

Regards,
Greg L-W.

You May Well Find The Following Letter
from the indomitable Anne Palmer - It is very worthy of consideration in the light of the facts:

Using The Treason Act 1702:

As you are perhaps aware I have been very concerned about Article 46A in the Treaty of Lisbon, “The Union shall have legal personality”. It happens to also be the smallest Article in the Treaty, but to me at least, it is among all those articles that are of the most important and most destructive of Articles to our own Constitution and surely, sheer treachery by a person whose solemn Oath of Allegiance is to this Country, a violation of that solemn Oath is the very essence of treason.

Up to now, I have always explained that in the giving to the European Union the
‘legal personality’ it so desires for allegedly Treaty making on behalf of all 27
Nation States, as far as the United Kingdom of Great Britain is concerned, it means giving to the EU the Royal Prerogative, which Ministers of the Queen use on behalf of Her Majesty under the Royal Prerogative.

This Royal Prerogative is also used for “war making powers’ and although that is not mentioned in the Treaty of Lisbon, the EU does want a European Army made up of all 27 Countries, so who can say what may happen in the future? I have always made clear, “That it is not in the Government’s ‘gift’ to give away those Royal Prerogative” powers. It is not the Governments to give away at all.

The Treason Act 1702 (1 Anne stat.2 c.21) is an Act of Parliament of England passed to enforce the line of succession to the English Throne, previously established by the Bill of Rights 1689 and the Act of Settlement 1701.

The Act makes it treason to “endeavour to deprive or hinder any person who shall be the next in succession to the Crown…from succeeding after the decease of Her Majesty (Whom God long preserve) to the imperial crown of this realm and the dominions thereunto belonging”.

Although the Act was passed by the English Parliament, it was later extended to Scotland as well in 1708, following the Union of the two Kingdoms in the previous year. The Parliament of Ireland passed a law to the same effect in 1703, the Treason Act (Ireland) 1703 (c5). This is still in force in Ireland.

In all the European Union Treaties that have been ratified thus far, none has actually handed over to the Union, the Royal Prerogative of Treaty making powers that Her Majesty’s Government Ministers use on behalf of The Crown. This action deprives the Crown of the power (authority-sovereignty) of what is to happen over the territory, not just over the Realm, but of the overseas territories, but over the United Kingdom of Great Britain also.

This also deprives the authority of the Crown in Parliament, once again so often quoted. The power of the Crown is the ultimate authority of Parliament and the Royal Prerogative. When all this is done, the Crown, as I once suggested in a Government Consultation document on “War Making Powers”, the Crown only should use the Royal Prerogative in the future. It would be a check-a safe guard- on which ever Political Party is in Government.

Ratification of the Treaty would deprive Her Majesty’s Government the ultimate authority of the use of the Royal Prerogative of Treaty making and possibly of war making powers which seems to me to be the ultimate treachery yet so casually given away, the intention made clear by the signing of the Treaty by the Prime Minister.

In the ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon it would revoke permanently the power of the Crown, though in truth, exercised by Parliament through the Royal Prerogative in the UK. Therefore the Crown no longer has the exclusive authority to apply the Royal Prerogative. It follows then that the same would apply to the next in line to the throne of the United Kingdom. The Crown will no longer have use of the Royal Prerogative for it so binds all her successors making the Crown subservient to the European Union forever.

In all the previous EU Treaties, EU laws and Directives have been transposed via our Parliament. The EU’s use of the Royal Prerogative for Treaty Making Powers, is direct, it by passes the British Parliament and uses the power of the Crown in the name of the Crown via the Royal Prerogative and hands full power exclusively in perpetuity to the EU. This Treaty, if ratified, removes the power of the Crown and Royal Prerogative from the British Crown and gives it to the European Union.

The Treaty of Lisbon binds the next Monarch, and makes the crown subservient to the EU and to the EU Judges. The Crown loses sovereignty over British Territory, Land, Sea and Air.

Background events. The EU has made agreements on behalf of Member States before as recorded in Hansard 18th June 2003 –Columns GC288- in which Lord Stoddart broke into the Grand Committee on the Extradition Bill (GC 287) a rather unusual occurrence, which according to Lord Stoddart, Commissioner Vitorino when he discussed the EU-US co-operation agreement in the European Parliament, said,

“This is the very first Union agreement in the field of Justice and Home Affairs and it will be a historic precedent”

No one in the House of Lords appeared to know anything about that “agreement” and that was bad enough but it does show, that without doubt, how the Union takes advantage and “goes on further than one would expect” perhaps when it feels it can get away with doing so.

The ‘blame’ for the EU putting through that agreement without any Parliamentary debate was put down to the “arrogant, executive powers wielded in intergovernmental cabal by the Council”.

There was no debate in our Parliament on whether we wanted to take part in the ‘agreement’, we had no chance to say, “we shall speak for ourselves” on this matter, but it was a ‘warning’ of how inadequate a British Parliament will become and how pointless it will be to elect and keep a British Parliament as deeper and more meaningful powers come into play.

But what if it happens again and again and there is absolutely nothing any national Government can do? It is essential the Oath of Allegiance ALL MP’s make, is teamed up with the transfer of the Royal Prerogative whether the latter the transferred, permanent, temporary, shared or loaned.

Anne Palmer
19th March, 2008

Please note the date!

"In politics, stupidity is not a handicap."
Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821),

Regards,
Greg L-W.

for all my contact details & Blogs:
CLICK HERE

For More Information & Facts visit:
WEB SITES:
SilentMajority/
WelshAssembly
CatterpillarsAndButterflies
Greg's WordPress Blog

‘The arrogance and hubris of corrupt politicians
will be responsible for every drop of blood spilt
in the Wars of Disassociation, if Britain does not
leave the EU.

The ugly, centralised, undemocratic supra national policies being imposed by the centralised and largely unelected decisionmakers of The EU for alien aims, ailien values and to suit alien needs stand every possibility of creating 200,000,000 deaths across EUrope as a result of the blind arrogance and hubris of the idiologues in the central dictatorship, and their economic illiteracy marching hand in glove with the idiocy of The CAP & The CFP - both policies which deliver bills, destroy lives and denude food stocks.

The EU, due to the political idiocy and corruption of its undemocratic leaders, is now a net importer of food, no longer able to feed itself and with a decreasing range of over priced goods of little use to the rest of the world to sell with which to counter the net financial drain of endless imports.

British Politicians with pens and treachery, in pursuit
of their own agenda and greed, have done more
damage to the liberty, freedoms, rights and democracy
of the British peoples than any army in over 1,000 years.

The disastrous effects of British politicians selling Britain
into the thrall of foreign rule by the EU for their own
personal rewards has damaged the well-being of Britain
more than the armies of Hitler
and the Franco - German - Italian axis of 1939 - 1945.

~ for more Quotes & Facts:
http://www.silentmajority.co.uk/

############-\\\///-########### #
############= ~ = ############
###########(`~0~0~') ###########
--------oooO--------(_)-------Oooo---------
############Regards############
##########M r C H A D###########

Until we gain our liberty, restore our sovereignty, repatriate our democracy and reinstate our Justice system and our borders - defended by our Police and Military armed with sustainable and obtainable weaponry:
Treat every election as a referendum.

Don't waste your vote on a self serving Politician in ANY election until we are liberated from the EU and are a Free Sovereign peoples, with independent control of our own borders, making and managing Law & Justice for our own benefit, in our own elected Westminster Parliament where we can fire our politicians at the ballot box, if they fail to represent OUR best interests.
Make your vote count
Write on YOUR ballot Paper
LEAVE THE EU